[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: DSTM
> > > In addition the user/client does not want to use any protocol
> > > transition that requires architecturally defined prefix within the
> > > IPv6 network (e.g. 6to4, Teredo).
> >
> > I don't understand this. What is the _technical_ requirement here?_
>
> Some enterprises will not want 2002:: or any hard coded prefix in their
> sites network addresses only IPv6 aggregatable address prefixes assigned
> to the site. Transition will use IPv6 or IPv4 addresses not Transition
> prefixes and DSTM supports that operational model.
transition technology other than DSTM can support the operational
model. so my question is, why DSTM is given special treatment here?
itojun
- References:
- RE: DSTM
- From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>