[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DSTM

> > > Some enterprises will not want 2002:: or any hard coded prefix in 
> > > their sites network addresses only IPv6 aggregatable 
> > address prefixes 
> > > assigned to the site.  Transition will use IPv6 or IPv4 
> > addresses not 
> > > Transition prefixes and DSTM supports that operational model.
> > 
> > 	transition technology other than DSTM can support the operational
> > 	model.  so my question is, why DSTM is given special treatment here?
> 
> DSTM is not asking for special treatment here and I don't understand why
> you say that can you please provide more context why you use the phrase
> "special treatment"?  Thanks.

	i was under impression that you're asking DSTM to be published without
	wait finishing scenario/analysis document, or if DSTM being mentioned 
	in the documents.  is my impression incorrrect?

itojun