Re: new I-D: Advanced IPv6 Internet Exchange model

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

Jordi,

My guess is that the RFC Editor does not want to be bombarded with -00
submissions from people who have left submission late, knowing they can
then submit a more complete 01 version a week later.   This just doubles
the processing workload for the Editor.

You can still update your draft, and release a 01 after discussion at 
San Diego?

Tim

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:57:36PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
> 
> Thanks for the input. Didn't know that ... and confused having seen others sometimes, but may be they were just announced in external sites, not IETF itself.
> 
> Anyway, I don't understand the reason ... any pointer to the right document that explains why ? Knowing that, it might make sense to avoid waiting for the last minute, submitting a worst version, but having the chance to update it ;-)
> 
> Actually it seems to me a way to don't help with getting it improved faster, if there are good comments from the WG !
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ralph Droms" <rdroms@cisco.com>
> To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:49 PM
> Subject: Re: new I-D: Advanced IPv6 Internet Exchange model
> 
> 
> > There's a Special Restriction that -00 drafts submitted within a few days 
> > of the -00 deadline can't be updated...
> > 
> > - Ralph
> > 
> > At 09:44 PM 7/12/2004 +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > >Well, if it has been submitted today, is an existing one, not ? I recall 
> > >having seen this before, but may be I'm wrong.
> > >
> > >If the Editor has no time to publish it in one week, then we have a 
> > >problem, but is not an author problem ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Tim Chown" <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> > >To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> > >Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:37 PM
> > >Subject: Re: new I-D: Advanced IPv6 Internet Exchange model
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 08:37:48PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Depending on the inputs, we may decide to review it during this week 
> > > and move quickly to a new version next Monday, so please, provide your 
> > > comments ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jordi,
> > > >
> > > > I don't think that's possible, only existing I-Ds can be revised on 19th.
> > > > Perhaps Pekka can confirm.
> > > >
> > > > Tim
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >**********************************
> > >Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
> > >Presentations and videos on line at:
> > >http://www.ipv6-es.com
> > >
> > >This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
> > >confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the 
> > >individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
> > >that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
> > >information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> **********************************
> Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
> Presentations and videos on line at:
> http://www.ipv6-es.com
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
>