[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mech-v2-05pre

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: mech-v2-05pre
From: Fred Templin <osprey67@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, Alex Conta <aconta@txc.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408242156310.3519-100000@netcore.fi>

Thanks for the comments, Pekka. One quick clarification:
 
> That said, if folks think it makes sense to spell this out, I'd rather
> suggest placing the version check as a new paragraph after the one you
> proposed, without the text in ()'s.

I can live without the text in ()'s, but the version check has
to come immediately after: "The encapsulating IPv4 header is
discarded". (If the version is bogus, no further IPv6 header
fields should be checked.)
 
Fred Templin
osprey67@yahoo.com

References:
- Re: mech-v2-05pre
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: mech-v2-05pre
Next by Date: RE: About Teredo authentication indication
Previous by thread: Re: mech-v2-05pre
Next by thread: Re: mech-v2-05pre
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread