Re: mech-v2-05pre

["O.L.N.Rao" <olnrao@samsung.com>]

Hi Pekka,

    The modifiet text is fine with me :)

Thank you,
O.L.N. Rao


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: "O.L.N.Rao" <olnrao@samsung.com>
Cc: "Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan" <rkrishnan.s@samsung.com>; "Fred Templin"
<osprey67@yahoo.com>; "Erik Nordmark" <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>;
<v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; "Alex Conta" <aconta@txc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: mech-v2-05pre


> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, O.L.N.Rao wrote:
> >     Some implementations first check whether there is atleast 40 bytes
(IPv6
> > Header Size) left in the packet.
> >     Once, it makes sure that there is atleast IPv6 Header Size data,
then it
> > tries to process the header.
> >     Here, the first field processed is IP Version.
>
> Good points; this is reflected at:
>
> http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/ietf/temp/draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-05pre2.txt
>
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/ietf/temp/draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-05pre2-diff.html
>
> See if it addresses your concerns (if OK, off-list is fine).
>
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>
>
>
>