[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: REVIEW NEEDED: zeroconf requirements document
Hi Juha,
If that is the case, then
shouldnt the document name & introduction mention that
this document is intended to satisfy the provide
zeroconf tunneling goals for transition in 3GPP?
IMHO, i guess the need of zeroconf
tunnelling is also there in other scenarios and not only in 3GPP.
If the document is made in such a way that it
addresses zeroconf tunneling goals that can be used in more scenarios it
will serve better.
Any opinions?
Regards
Radhakrishnan
IPng Team
Samsung India Software Operations
Bangalore
India.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 2:21
PM
Subject: RE: REVIEW NEEDED: zeroconf requirements
document
Hi, Radhakrishnan!
It is because 3GPP Analysis
www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-analysis-10.txt
(see sections 3.1 and 6)
has found a need for a
simple tunneling mechanism. Commission has been given by the ADs to write down a
minimal set of requirements required for 3GPP environment automatic tunneling.
This was discussed in IETF#60 v6ops meeting.
However, this document *may*
be applicable for other environments too.
BR,
-Juha
W.-
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
[mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org]On
Behalf Of ext Radhakrishnan
Suryanarayanan
Sent: 03 September, 2004 11:33
To: JORDI PALET
MARTINEZ
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re:
REVIEW NEEDED: zeroconf requirements document
Hi
Jordi,
Why is there a special emphasis on 3GPP in this
document?
Regards
Radhakrishnan
----- Original Message -----
From: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To:
<v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Sent:
Friday, September 03, 2004 3:45 AM
Subject: Re: REVIEW NEEDED: zeroconf
requirements document
Hi Yushun,
Sorry, yes you're right it
will make no difference, something very weird
happened. Now is
solved.
http://www.v6ops.euro6ix.net/ietf/draft-nielsen-v6ops-zeroconf-goals-01.txt
(at least is working for me, both IPv4 and IPv6).
But
also it has already been published "officially":
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nielsen-v6ops-zeroconf-goals-01.txt
Regards,
Jordi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yu-Shun Wang" <yushunwa@ISI.EDU>
To:
"Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>;
"JORDI PALET MARTINEZ"
<jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: REVIEW
NEEDED: zeroconf requirements document
> Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)
wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Please use the non-direct
link
> > http://www.v6ops.euro6ix.net/zerotunnel.php#
> > to retrieve the document
(draft-nielsen-v6ops-zeroconf-goals-01.txt).
>
> Hi,
Karen,
>
> That's how I got it. The -00 is fine, but could you
check
> the -01 file again?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
yushun
>
> > I apologize for the inconvenience.
>
>
> > Karen
> >
> >
> >>-----Original
Message-----
> >>From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
[mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org]On
> >>Behalf Of Yu-Shun
Wang
> >>Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:49 PM
>
>>To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> >>Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
>
>>Subject: Re: REVIEW NEEDED: zeroconf requirements document
>
>>
> >>
> >>JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
>>
> >>>Hi all,
> >>>
>
>>>There is also a direct link as
> >>
>
>>http://www.v6ops.euro6ix.net/ietf/draft-nielsen-v6ops-zeroconf
>
>>-goals-01.txt.
> >>
> >>Hi,
>
>>
> >>Is it just me or are there non-ASCII characters in the
doc file?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
>
>>yushun
> >>
> >>
>
>>>Regards,
> >>>Jordi
> >>>
>
>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "Karen E.
Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>
> >>>To: "'Pekka Savola'" <pekkas@netcore.fi>; <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
>
>>>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:56 AM
>
>>>Subject: RE: REVIEW NEEDED: zeroconf requirements document
>
>>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>
> >>>>Dear All,
> >>>>
>
>>>>The promised revised version,
>
>>>>draft-nielsen-v6ops-zeroconf-goals-01.txt,
>
>>>>can be found on the following link:
>
>>>>
>
>>>>http://www.v6ops.euro6ix.net/zerotunnel.php#
>
>>>>
> >>>>On behalf of the authors I would like
to echo Pekka's
> >>>>request for a review of this
work.
> >>>>
> >>>>Feedback are requested on
the general scope
> >>>>of the documents as well as on the
particular set of
> >>>>individual goals put forward.
>
>>>>
> >>>>Please scrutinize.
>
>>>>
> >>>>BR, Karen
>
>>>>
> >>>>The drafts has been submitted to the
IDs,
> >>>>but it will probably take a while for it to
appear.
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
>>>>
> >>>>>-----Original Message-----
>
>>>>>From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
[mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org]On
> >>>>>Behalf Of Pekka
Savola
> >>>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:29
PM
> >>>>>To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
>
>>>>>Subject: Re: REVIEW NEEDED: zeroconf requirements
document
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
>
>>>>>(co-chair hat on)
> >>>>>
>
>>>>>The document editor just said that a revised
version,
> >>
> >>addressing the
>
>>
> >>>>>input received so far, could be available
for tomorrow.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>So,
please hold off the review until the new revision has been made
>
>>>>>available (-01 version). Let's shift the review DL by
one
> >>
> >>day, to 7th
> >>
>
>>>>>September.
> >>>>>
>
>>>>>Thanks to the surprisingly active document editor and
authors! :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>(hat
off)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Wed, 1 Sep
2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >>>>>
>
>>>>>
> >>>>>>(co-chair hat on)
>
>>>>>>
> >>>>>>If you recall from the
IETF60 meeting, we set out a couple of
>
>>>>>>milestonoes and deadlines to make progress well before
the next
> >>>>>>meeting -- and now the planning and
scheduling for IETF61
> >>>>>
>
>>>>>has already
> >>>>>
>
>>>>>
> >>>>>>started...
>
>>>>>>
> >>>>>>We need to get more
input especially on:
> >>>>>>
>
>>>>>>
> >>>>
>
>>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nielsen-v6ops-zero
>
>
> > conf-goals-00.txt
> >
> >>>>Please
read it and send feedback on the list. Please do this as soon
>
>>>>as possible but on 6th September at the latest.
>
>>>>
> >>>>In particular, opinions on whether the
document should include the
> >>>>applicability in the ISP
networks (e.g., when the access network
> >>>>cannot be
upgraded [which seems to have similar requirements as 3GPP])
>
>>>>would be highly appreciated.
> >>>>
>
>>>>Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>(hat
off)
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
>>>
> >>>--
> >>>Pekka
Savola
"You each name yourselves king, yet the
> >>>Netcore
Oy
kingdom bleeds."
> >>>Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R.
Martin: A Clash of Kings
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>>**********************************
> >>Madrid 2003 Global
IPv6 Summit
> >>Presentations and videos on line at:
>
>>http://www.ipv6-es.com
> >>
> >>This electronic
message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The
information is intended to be for the use of the
individual(s) named above.
If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this
information, including attached
files, is prohibited.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Yu-Shun Wang
<yushunwa@isi.edu>
> USC
Information Sciences
Institute
>
**********************************
Madrid 2003
Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com
This
electronic message contains information which may be privileged
or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of
the
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be
aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
this
information, including attached files, is
prohibited.