Re: draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt

["EricLKlein" <ericlklein@softhome.net>]

Margaret,

I am still a little uncomfortable about the fact that there is no explicit
statement that "teredo is needed because NAT was deprecated in IPv6 so
teredo is needed to allow IPv6 nodes to communicate with IPv4 nodes in a
domain that utilizes NAT."

This is still true in section 3.2.4 Automatic sunset.
Some how this whole section scares me as it seems to imply that there is a
way to turn an IPv4 NAT into an IPv6 Router while maintaining the NAT like
functionality. As stated above, NAT is not part of IPv6 (NAP is but is still
not mentioned in this document).

Eric
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com>
To: <ericlklein@softhome.net>; <henrik@levkowetz.com>;
<karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>; <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>;
<Markku.Ala-Vannesluoma@nokia.com>; "Jonathan Rosenberg"
<jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com>
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: 05 December, 2004 5:47 PM
Subject: draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt


>
> Hi Eric, Henrik, Karen, Francis, Markku and Jonathan,
>
> There is a new version of the Teredo draft available at:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt
>
> Could you check whether this version addresses the issues that you
> raised during IETF LC?  It would be best if you could review this
> document and return any feedback by this Thursday, 9-Dec-04.
>
> If there are no further objections, I will place this draft on the
> IESG agenda for consideration on our 16-Dec-04 telechat.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Margaret
>
>