[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Interest to have as an WG item: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: Interest to have as an WG item: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
From: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:06:28 -0800
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501141329010.25536@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412202320560.4390@netcore.fi> <1104760395.4819.244.camel@essrv103nok154154.ntc.nokia.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501141329010.25536@netcore.fi>

Well, I'm not a security expert, far from that, so I'm not sure I can comment on the quality of the security assertions. However, at fist glance, it seems that this is a tutorial on ikev1 & ikev2 in the context of IPv6... I other words, it is unclear to me why we need this document in v6Ops and why it is not homed in a security related wg IF there is a need for such a document.

On another note, some of the techniques described here may be useful in the context of v6tc...

	- Alain.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- Interest to have as an WG item: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
  - From: "Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
- Re: Interest to have as an WG item: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Interest to have as an WG item: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
Next by Date: Re: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
Previous by thread: Re: Interest to have as an WG item: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
Next by thread: Re: draft-tschofenig-v6ops-secure-tunnels-03.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread