RE: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document

[Salman Asadullah <sasad@cisco.com>]

At 04:09 PM 2/15/2005 +0100, Mikael.Lind@teliasonera.com wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
> What I'm referring to is access networks where DHCP snooping and IP
> filters in the first access switch are the main anti spoofing
> mechanisms
> and where there is no logical separation between customers. This
> requires IP awareness further out in the network and therefore IPv6
> support is needed as well. The scenario is similar to the example 2
> in
> 8.2 in the isp scenarios-analysis document. I know this doesn't
> describe
> it very well but I'm willing to provide input to the BB scenarios
> document if needed. 

Hello Mikael,

We would love to work with you to understand the further details and
include it in the next revision of this IETF draft if needed.

Regards,
Salman


>  
> Yes it has been deployed in IPv4 and seems to be picking up as an
> access
> network design offered by many different vendors. 
>
> /Mikael
>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 Mikael.Lind@teliasonera.com wrote:
> > > What I think it needs is an
> > > addition of emerging broadband scenarios. I'm especially
> thinking of
> > > Ethernet based broadband networks, LAN or DSL, where
> neither
> > > VLAN/PVC nor PPPoE is used. This is a rather complicated
> scenario
> > > for introducing IPv6 and as it still is under
> development/deployment
> > > an IPv6 recommendation would be very useful.
> > 
> > Mikael, I think you'll need to elaborate a bit about this scenario
> :)
> > -- which scenario/deployment model you have in mind?  Has this
> been
> > deployed with IPv4 yet?
> >