[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Subject: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
From: Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:55:36 +0200
Cc: "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

Opinions?

I am not sure I share the view that the BOF was a non-event. There was an agreement from a *large majority* of people in the room to say that the WG should take TSP that fulfills all requirements presented, and make it a standard. Now I guess it's time to move on in that direction.

Jerome

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
  - From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>

Prev by Date: Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
Next by Date: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
Previous by thread: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
Next by thread: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread