Re: [Fwd: draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption and draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault]

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

On Apr 10, 2005, at 12:24 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
> I think it is important to document this kind of background, so that 
> vendors realize why they should be removing the onlink assumption 
> (when updating their 2461 implementation to 2461bis they might not 
> bother or even notice it otherwise).  A document like this also serves 
> as a way to document the arguments if someone later on brings this up 
> again.

OK. Lets make sure that the normative document and the explanatory 
document point to each other and send them in together. I will 
coordinate with Bob+Margaret on coordination if you folks would be so 
kind as to get the document sorted out.