On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 22:04 +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi Jeroen, > > I've attached it in a previous email yesterday to v6ops, until the deadline > queue is emptied ... Anyway is also available at: > > http://www.consulintel.euro6ix.org/ietf/draft-palet-v6ops-6in4-vs-6over4-00. > txt I missed out on the attachment I guess :) My 'solution' to the 6in4 vs 6over4 debate is simple: call 6in4 'proto-41', as that is what it is. Not clear directly clear to end users, but they can Google for it and then it becomes clear. End users don't know what MPLS and a lot of other acronyms are either. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part