RE: Teredo spec has been published!

["Bora Akyol" <bora@broadcom.com>]

I think it would be bad if the Teredo prefix was announced via eBGP.
Each domain is supposed to announce
the Teredo prefix within the domain, not outside, if I understood it
correctly. I would also expect
each AS to filter out the announced prefix.

Bora
 
----------------------------------------------------------

	 
	This problem, for example,
	1. Based on current Teredo spec, the core router in an IPv6
network shall advertise 2001:0000::/32 route through BGP4+ to other
ASes, to ensure the connectivity of its own Teredo users. Also, I think
it's better for the core router to also act as a Teredo relay router,
otherwise too many static routes have to be configured. But how can  we
expect the IPv6 core router to have the native IPv4 connection?