v6ops Agenda

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

So this is my agenda for Thursday. We have two hours, which with six  
items on the agenda means that each discussion should be limited to  
about 15-20 minutes.

When I say "determine trajectory", I mean the answer to two basic  
questions:
	* is the working group interested in picking this up
	* if it is, where is it in that process. Are we ready for WGLC on  
the list, or are there
	  comments that have to be addressed before?

1) IPv6 in CableLabs DOCSIS 3.0
       Alain Durand
       Objective: Discussion of IPv6 in Docsis 3.0 & Cable network
	(Document not posted due to glitch between IETF and Cable Labs  
schedules; to be
         posted after IETF meeting)

2) discussion of "Best Current Practice for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages  
in Firewalls", Elwyn Davies, Janos Mohacsi, 9-Mar-06, <draft-ietf- 
v6ops-icmpv6-filtering-bcp-01.txt>
        Elwyn Davie
        Objective: initiate WGLC as either BCP or Informational
	This will depend on people having read this version of the document

3) Discussion of "IPv6 Routing Policies Guidelines", Marc Blanchet, 7- 
Mar-06, <draft-blanchet-v6ops-routing-guidelines-01.txt>
        Marc Blanchet
        Objective: determine trajectory of this work

4) Discussion of point-to-point issue in the following two drafts:
        Tim Chown with comments from Jordi Palet
        Objective: determine trajectory of the combined work
  "IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations", Gunter Van de  
Velde,
  13-Feb-06, <draft-vandevelde-v6ops-addcon-00.txt>

  "Guidelines for Numbering IPv6 Point-to-Point Links and Easing the  
Addressing
  Plans", Jordi Palet, 1-Mar-06, <draft-palet-v6ops-point2point-00.txt>

5) Discussion of "ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Wireless Broadband  
Access Networks", Myung-Ki Shin, Youn-Hee Han, 2-Mar-06, <draft-shin- 
v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-00.txt>
        Myung-Ki Shu
        Objective: determine trajectory of document

6) Working group discussion of trajectory of the following two  
documents. they should be done if the prior WGLC comments have been  
addressed. I'm looking for a show of hands that people have read the  
latest update and consider them done.
  "IPv6 Enterprise Network Analysis", Jim Bound, 15-Feb-06,
  <draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-analysis-04.txt>

  "Using IPsec to Secure IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels", Pekka Savola, 8-Mar-06,
  <draft-ietf-v6ops-ipsec-tunnels-02.txt>