[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt
- To: "'Thomas Narten'" <narten@us.ibm.com>, "'Bound, Jim'" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
- Subject: RE: Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt
- From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0700
- Cc: "'Fred Baker'" <fred@cisco.com>, "'Brian E Carpenter'" <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, "'EricLKlein'" <ericlklein@softhome.net>, <gunter@cisco.com>, "'Ralph Droms'" <rdroms@cisco.com>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "'Lindqvist Erik Kurt'" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, "'Margaret Wasserman'" <margaret@thingmagic.com>
- In-reply-to: <200605311408.k4VE8DHn003842@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Thomas Narten wrote:
> That is, given /48s to end sites, stateless address autoconfiguration
> and 64-bit interface identifiers, do we undermine our own credibility
> by claiming IPv6 supports 10^38 addresses?
There are that many addresses no matter how they are allocated. In any case
last night I added a qualifier about 10^18 subnets because there have been
so many complaints about that being such a big number.
Tony