Re: Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt

["Eric Klein" <ericlklein@softhome.net>]

I realize that just how many addresses are available for allocation is important, and has apparently struck a nerve in the WG, but can we stop with the mathmatical discussion about how many addresses there are part of the review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt.

 

This draft is not about how many addresses there are but only referenced the fact that there were a lot and that NAT is not part of IPv6.

 

If there needs to be a discussion about address pools and their sizes, can we change the subject to be "How many addresses are there" or some such and leave this one to be a discussion of the merits and flaws of this speciffic draft.

 

As one of the co-authors I am loosing the flow of what needs to be changed in the side topic (and multiple e-mails) related to questions about numbering and renumbering.

 

Thanks,

Eric