[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: v6 multihoming and route filters
On 5 jul 2006, at 20.55, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
And since the IETF is (hopefully) the place where internet routing
is best understood an the IETF has historically always had an
operational component (hence the existence of this very working
group), I think the IETF can't shy away from at the very least
discouraging harmful practices, and preferably also pointing out
tradeoffs that exist between different choices and recommend best
practices if such can be identified.
But the IETF have no understanding of the underlying financial
motives. I certainly agree that it's bad practice but there is no way
that the IETF in practice can enforce a policy of /48 multihoming OR
filtering at /32 - except to present alternative technologies.
- kurtis -