RE: Resolution of my discuss comments for draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt

["Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>]

The ID is essentially more detail on how to work around the ingress filters
with tunnels and source routing, but the outcome is already covered in 3704.


Tony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 5:30 PM
> To: Tony Hain
> Cc: 'Jari Arkko'; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Resolution of my discuss comments for draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-
> 02.txt
> 
> 
> On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
> 
> >> The one remaining thing that I would suggest you add here is
> >> a warning about the issues in multihoming and ingress filtering.
> >> If I read Section 4.7, I get the feeling that multiple prefixes and
> >> multiple ISPs works fine today, which may not be exactly correct,
> >> see e.g. draft-huitema-shim6-ingress-filtering. Do not add a lot
> >> of text, just mention that there are issues in some cases in the
> >> multiple-ISP model.
> >
> > Does this work for you:
> > Additional considerations are being documented as multihoming work
> > evolves
> > xref  ---  draft-bagnulo-shim6-ingress-filtering-00.txt
> 
> I eonfder how many of these are discussed in RFC 3704?