[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about past advice to RIRs
Under the heading better late than never...
On 16-aug-2006, at 12:02, Tim Chown wrote:
- GFN
Geographical aggregation using BGP(?)
Reference?
This stands for "geo for now", the idea being that we'd use
geographical addressing in the short term and use these as
identifiers in MHAP, an id/loc seperation solution. GFN culminated into:
- Provider-Internal Aggregation based on Geography to Support
Multihoming
in IPv6
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-van-beijnum-multi6-isp-
int-aggr-00.txt
Suggests geograophically based aggregation of provider address
space.
(Expires Apr 2003)
- GAPI: A Geographically Aggregatable Provider Independent Address
Space
to Support Multihoming in IPv6
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-py-multi6-gapi-00.txt
An address allocation scheme based on geography and city size.
(Expires Apr 2003)
These two are superseded by the (also long since expired):
http://www.muada.com/drafts/draft-van-beijnum-multi6-isp-int-aggr-01.txt