[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Monday morning
- To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Monday morning
- From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:32:07 -0700
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-2.cisco.com; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=3136; t=1161347531; x=1162211531; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:Monday=20morning; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DCUIp/ACxQzJEUu3AjTHPQkWUUOo=3D; b=WA9E73vcvNQKlpjEwBx4Hyf3wtWfXDbkc+KcLVm6/8TmQrfyoZoewfOGEaUzR9kcQFLAhPTG 4c4YDeWkTZsX17jogdzPFecX3uBUQEUKVyk3x+05knPE2+amB011fFdi;
We are on for 9:00 AM Monday morning. I expect all to attend, and to
not have been drinking very heavily the night before.
Note that for this agenda, I am proposing two documents that have not
been sent to the internet-drafts directory. In this, I am violating
my own rule and a general IETF understanding, which I'm not happy
about. I am doing this is because I think the discussion warrants it,
and because one of them promises (cross her heart) to send it in
following the IETF, and to post the document at her web site for
review..
proposed agenda for the v6ops working group
Continuing work:
up to (preferably less than) 15 minutes each for the following. In
each case except renumbering, my objective is working group last call
after the meeting. In the case of renumbering, the objective is a
recommendation to the chairs and the AD on the direction of the work.
draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-01.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipsec-tunnels-03.txt
discussion of address selection policy, Ruri Hiromi
draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt
draft-ietf-v6ops-campus-transition-00.txt
draft-chown-v6ops-renumber-thinkabout-05.txt
an hour for the following, objective being working group consensus on
the topic:
comments from the IAB on Internet routing today and in the future
Marla's Word file sent to the mailing list
draft-van-beijnum-v6ops-pa-mhome-community-01.txt
draft-baker-v6ops-l3-multihoming-analysis-00.txt
I would encourage you to read, in advance:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chown-v6ops-renumber-
thinkabout-05.txt
"Things to think about when Renumbering an IPv6 network", Tim
Chown, 20-Sep-06
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-
deployment-scenarios-01.txt
"IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in 802.16(e) Networks", Myung-Ki Shin,
2-Oct-06
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-01.txt
"IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations", Gunter Van de
Velde, 11-Jul-06
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-campus-
transition-00.txt
"IPv6 Campus Transition Scenario Description and Analysis", Tim
Chown, 16-Oct-06
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipsec-
tunnels-03.txt
"Using IPsec to Secure IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels", Pekka Savola,
10-Oct-06
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-v6ops-l3-
multihoming-analysis-00.txt
"Multihomed IPv6 prefix delegation, aggregation, and distribution",
Fred Baker, Marla Azinger, 16-Oct-06,
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-van-beijnum-v6ops-pa-
mhome-community-01.txt
"BGP Community for PA Multihoming", Iljitsch van Beijnum, 28-Sep-06
Also the note that Ruri posts to the list regarding her draft.
In each case, I would appreciate knowing in advance who will speak,
and IETF policy requires that the ppt/pdf presentations be sent to me
in advance. I have to post them...
I am also in need of volunteers to act as jabber scribe and to take
minutes.