Fred,
More comments
p.3 says "Fortune 500" while p. 20 has "Fortune 1000".
p.18 above the diagram "the links from B<->A and B<->A were
shorter", why two B<->A?
p.19 near the top "issues... relate to human stupidity". How about
"human error"?
p.27 section 5. "From the author's perspective" when the draft has
two authors.
This is a good summary of what is going on plus projections. But
overall it feels
that the current architecture constrains the market and it does not
scale. The draft
illustrates the need for flexible PI addressing with the model such
as "a service
domain. That domain could as easily be the customers of a
cooperative as the
citizens of a government". Any given tax authority is a good proxy
for such
cooperative and it could assume a mechanical function of the
distribution and
management of PI.
Providers would get through RIR an independent set of
geographically rigid
aggregation points, eg. ASN. A new protocol could be needed to
combine PI+ASN for
scalable routing(?)
Thanks,
Peter
______________________________________________________________________
______________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited