Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-03.txt ... ULAs of shorter-than-/48 and ULA multicast scope matching ...

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:04:17PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> On 2007-03-13 16:28, Tim Chown wrote:
> 
> >Fair comment.   I guess we're also nibbling here at the 'what's a site'
> >question.  I don't know where Thomas Narten's 3177-bis proposal got to,
> >but if end sites were allocated a /56 you'd probably want a /56 ULA...
> 
> A /48 ULA would do just fine. They aren't going to be in short supply.

I would assume doing that would affect the collision probabilities?

-- 
Tim