Re: Review of v6ops-routing-guidelines ID

["Ryon Zhang" <hfzhang.cn@gmail.com>]

I think this states a basic routing filtering guideline, which means it's up to date itself and  maybe  modified according to  operators' specific requirements.   So maybe the Intended Status can be changed to "Informational".

Ryon

2007/3/19, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>:

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Durand, Alain wrote:
> I would much favor a document listing 'special case IPv6 addresses'
...

I'd support this approach.  I believe that the operators should be
clueful enough to figure out which special-case prefixes they want to
filter and how without the IETF having to give recommendations;
something like the summary table of Section 3 of RFC3330 (and possibly
some supporting background like Section 2) might be sufficient.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings