Re: Review of v6ops-routing-guidelines ID

[Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>]

After discussion with wg chairs, I have written and sent another  
draft based on the RFC3330-for-ipv6 idea (RFC3330 was the starting  
point instead of RFC2772) to the internet-draft repository. You  
should see the announcement as soon as it reopens. So that way, wg  
can compare both approaches.  when published, I will send my own  
summary of diffs.

Marc.

Le 07-03-20 à 18:40, Joe Abley a écrit :

> On 19-Mar-2007, at 17:52, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Durand, Alain wrote:
> > > I would much favor a document listing 'special case IPv6 addresses'
> > ...
> >
> > I'd support this approach.  I believe that the operators should be  
> > clueful enough to figure out which special-case prefixes they want  
> > to filter and how without the IETF having to give recommendations;  
> > something like the summary table of Section 3 of RFC3330 (and  
> > possibly some supporting background like Section 2) might be  
> > sufficient.
>
> As I think I mentioned at the microphone yesterday, I also like  
> this approach.
>
>
> Joe

-----
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley, 2006, http://www.ipv6book.ca