[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC4214(bis)
- To: "Fred Baker" <fred@cisco.com>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- Subject: RE: RFC4214(bis)
- From: "Durand, Alain" <Alain_Durand@cable.comcast.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:13:05 -0400
- Cc: "Brian E Carpenter" <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, "Ron Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Mark Townsley" <townsley@cisco.com>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "Lindqvist Erik Kurt" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, "David Ward" <dward@cisco.com>
- In-reply-to: <69BD6B46-47FD-4E13-93E1-6CBB6C57F5C5@cisco.com>
Fred,
The softwires wg is looking at two frameworks, of for the "Hub and
Spoke" case
and the "Mesh" case, as described in the softwire problem statement:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-softwire-problem-statemen
t-03.txt
Isatap was briefly considered but does not fit any of those two cases.
The softwires wg chose L2TP for "Hub and Spoke" and
a BGP extension (tunnel safi) for "Mesh".
- Alain, softwire co-chair.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:35 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Brian E Carpenter; Ron Bonica; Jari Arkko; Mark Townsley;
> v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Lindqvist Erik Kurt
> Subject: Re: RFC4214(bis)
>
> Fred:
>
> What is the status of ISATAP in softwire? I understand that
> softwire is chartered to specify "the standardization of
> discovery, control and encapsulation methods for connecting
> IPv4 networks across IPv6 networks and IPv6 networks across
> IPv4 networks in a way that will encourage multiple,
> inter-operable implementations." I also understand that
> ISATAP was considered there?
>
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/softwire-charter.html
>
>