[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The argument for writing a general purpose NAT for IPv6

To: jhw@apple.com
Subject: Re: The argument for writing a general purpose NAT for IPv6
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:27:06 +0900 (JST)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:01:51 -0700" <D7BFDD9F-10A1-4FAF-91D1-580292AC336E@apple.com>
References: <D7BFDD9F-10A1-4FAF-91D1-580292AC336E@apple.com>

	i'm responding to all article with this title, and going through emails
	backwards, so sorry if you got bored.

	NAT must be killed togherther with rthdr0, so they are in love.
	let them suicide, otherwise you have doomsday.

itojun

References:
- Re: The argument for writing a general purpose NAT for IPv6
  - From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>

Prev by Date: RE: The argument for writing a general purpose NAT for IPv6
Next by Date: Re: The argument for writing a general purpose NAT for IPv6
Previous by thread: RE: The argument for writing a general purpose NAT for IPv6
Next by thread: application listener discovery in the presence of stateful firewalls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread