Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Have people here looked at this? It's "interesting". > > http://bill.herrin.us/arin-policy-proposal.html Interesting in the direction that it has been shot down already and not officially proposed. On the PPML list various people have already commented against it. Mainly because the people who do not want IPv6 address space really are not going to use it suddenly when they get it force-fed. Also 6to4 already allows those folks to have huge amounts of IPv6 addresses. Fortunately there is a limit to only allow 2002::/16 to be announced. Long list of arguments agains the above one: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-June/007543.html See http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-June/thread.html for more arguments against and only few minor supportive ones. Another proposal made, but by Owen DeLong, is much more interesting: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-June/007585.html short: allow legacy holders to get 5-year free IPv6 space when they turn legacy space into ARIN-maintained space. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature