[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BCP for multisite multihoming

To: Nick Hilliard <nick-lists@netability.ie>
Subject: Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
From: David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:40:47 -0500
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org, IPv6 Ops list <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>
In-reply-to: <20070722183710.GA55165@muffin.acquirer.com>
References: <6277E059-3A64-4AEA-8489-1FFDBB953476@dragondata.com> <200705221514.l4MFEopk010115@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <465398B2.1040500@baycix.de> <4653F6F6.3070206@gmail.com> <9e31186f0707200517g9fb2694oc6abc0296513c863@mail.gmail.com> <20070722183710.GA55165@muffin.acquirer.com>

On Jul 22, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:

Can we agree to consign the idea of geographic addressing to thescrap heap
where it belongs, please?


Apparently not.

Rgds,
-drc

References:
- BCP for multisite multihoming
  - From: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>
- Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
- Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
  - From: Sascha Lenz <slz@baycix.de>
- Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
  - From: "Carlos Garcia Braschi" <cgbraschi@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
Next by Date: Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-req-02.txt
Previous by thread: Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
Next by thread: Re: BCP for multisite multihoming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread