[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outsi de US ?)

To: alh-ietf@tndh.net
Subject: RE: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outsi de US ?)
From: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:53:09 +0300
Cc: marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Reply-to: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>

I may be missing some context (I'm bandwidth challenged right now and unable to check archives). But its unclear to me where you jumped to the conclusion that DHCP problems in Chicago had something to do with a specific protocol and that this implies we need to deploy an alternate solution in IPv6. If anything, multiple solutions seem to increase the likelihood of interop and configuration problems.

Jari

Follow-Ups:
- RE: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outsi de US ?)
  - From: "Durand, Alain" <Alain_Durand@cable.comcast.com>

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3330-for-ipv6-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?)
Previous by thread: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?)
Next by thread: RE: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outsi de US ?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread