Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP

To: Ralph Droms ((rdroms)) <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:53:05 +0200
Cc: "Kevin Loch" <kloch@kl.net>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <6F66F4F04858B945B836804F0F2AE6BB02D0571F@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com>
References: <6F66F4F04858B945B836804F0F2AE6BB02D0571F@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com>

On 14-sep-2007, at 23:21, Ralph Droms ((rdroms)) wrote:

Sounds to me you're willing to force network admins to use RAs whenthey
don't really want to.

Which sound remarkably like what you object to when you think network
admins are being forced to use DHCP.

We'll see when a draft appears that explains how to run an IPv6network without RAs.

And only a few messages back I mentioned that I sometimes use manualconfiguration in lieu of RAs...

References:
- RE: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
  - From: "Ralph Droms \(rdroms\)" <rdroms@cisco.com>