Re: Enhanced SIIT

To: todd@fries.net
Subject: Re: Enhanced SIIT
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:27:53 +1300
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i0kAAnp8x0aRxt60pwKb+wIjfggeuasTIbGB5evCJoP3wrhr9bLW7ggGqQofXVpWb2uKSA5QIAkAboSr+aYQP49ictMMkk6UNVh5NF7v4XgMUl/IxhrCZAI3ZE9BfUHNOaZxdb/A60thZ6p8cf90yfhQPPb8ra0d59aEVDR0cNY=
In-reply-to: <20071018154832.GB30053@fries.net>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <42AD25EF-5818-41F4-AB1D-C0D41B60ACCA@muada.com> <47167542.1020309@gmail.com> <207A918F-91F0-4B3B-971B-47BFDAC95746@muada.com> <20071018114915.GA2096@fries.net> <8DE7D48C-DAA9-4DCA-9963-63E0D5756F0F@muada.com> <20071018122712.GB2096@fries.net> <87A9F05E-D042-479C-A427-AE9CA426AC79@muada.com> <20071018154832.GB30053@fries.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

On 2007-10-19 04:48, todd@fries.net wrote:
...


I love this.  This specifically states that NAT should never have gone through
IETF, in my understanding.


It didn't. See RFC 2993 and 3027 for example. RFC 3022 is not a standard.

   Brian

References:
- Enhanced SIIT
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: Enhanced SIIT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Enhanced SIIT
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: Enhanced SIIT
  - From: "Todd T. Fries" <todd@fries.net>
- Re: Enhanced SIIT
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: Enhanced SIIT
  - From: "Todd T. Fries" <todd@fries.net>
- Re: Enhanced SIIT
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Re: Enhanced SIIT
  - From: todd@fries.net