[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 32.1.0.0/16 and v6 collateral damage
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:04:01PM -0600, Kevin Day wrote:
> (resending because I don't think this made it through last time,
> please ignore any duplicates)
I see it for the first time, so the first time definitely didn't make
it here.
> We had an ISP contact us saying we were announcing 32.1.73.0/24 (part
> of AT&T's space) which was breaking something for them. In fact,
> random subnets in 32.1.0.0/16 were showing up in their routing table
> going to all sorts of ASNs, which was confusing to them.
> [ .. ]
Ugh.
Have you been able to pinpoint the specific device in the path where the
breakage occured? If yes, do you know the model and software version number?
[..]
> Has anyone else seen any breakage involving 32.1.0.0/16 (2001::) or
> 32.2.0.0/16 (2002::)?
I haven't. (Well, IPv6 peers show up in the BGP mib with 32.1.0.0
addresses, but that's a completely unrelated phenomenom).
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 110584
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279