[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CPEs

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:20:40AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2008-01-07 22:38, Shane Kerr wrote:
> >
> >Again, my preference is to support both old and new addresses during a
> >renumbering, but I don't know if IPv6 is mature enough technology,
> 
> See RFC 4192.
> 
> >or
> >if we have enough space after squandering so much of it.
> 
> Huh? The canonical model is for multiple prefixes per site;
> there isn't any issue about it.

For some tests run a couple of years ago, see:
	http://www.6net.org/publications/deliverables/D3.6.2.pdf

For a small enterprise, the RFC4192 process basically worked with
the OSes and platforms we used, but that was without any use of DHCPv6
(all RAs/autoconf).

The pain with renumbering lies outside the 'basic' network layer
reconfigurations of RFC4192 though.

-- 
Tim