Re: Should CPE allow all IPsec through? Was: Re: CPEs

[james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>]

On Jan 8, 2008, at 12:00, Dan Wing wrote:
> Or that those less secure peer-to-peer applications will run over  
> UDP/500 and protocol 50.
Yes, but I don't think that's where the resistance to the idea of  
allow udp/500 and proto/50 to pass from exterior to interior by  
default originates.  I think the resistance originates from the very  
simple (and stupid) expectation that the default rules for all  
firewalls is to disallow unsolicited traffic from the exterior to  
reach interior nodes.  Making an exception for udp/500 and proto/50  
involves *thinking* about why those packets are "safe" and not any  
others.  Thinking is hard and exceptions are complicated, making  
everything difficult to understand.
That said, I will note that the current CPE simple security I-D  
recommends that unsolicited udp/500 and proto/50 be allowed to pass  
from the exterior to interior nodes by default.  (The specific  
recommendations are R16 and R17.)
Is there a consensus in the working group that these recommendations  
should be reversed?

--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering