[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6to4 public anycast relay considered a bad think (was Re: 6to4 connectivity test)

To: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: 6to4 public anycast relay considered a bad think (was Re: 6to4 connectivity test)
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:56:55 +0100
Cc: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>, v6ops Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=OMhfAgCBl2ldBwZALBbz2qpHvY+Lrxl/NTs3r8w3xK4Vhw2W57uYpYHOWQ2Fxw0n ;
In-reply-to: <C3C8EF4E.A8B5%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
References: <89C4B01D-C26D-411B-8AA5-BDB3B1AF724A@apple.com> <C3C8EF4E.A8B5%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Alain Durand wrote:
> Essentially, expecting to get a functioning 6to4 relay is expecting a free
> lunch. Who is going to pay for it?

If enough ISPs provide working 6to4 relays, serving their own customers
(that pay for the bandwidth, be it IPv4 or IPv4-encapsulated IPv6), the
model would work just fine.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  110584

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 6to4 public anycast relay considered a bad think (was Re: 6to4 connectivity test)
  - From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>

References:
- 6to4 connectivity test
  - From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
- 6to4 public anycast relay considered a bad think (was Re: 6to4 connectivity test)
  - From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 6to4 public anycast relay considered a bad think (was Re: 6to4 connectivity test)
Next by Date: Re: 6to4 considered a bad thing
Previous by thread: Re: 6to4 public anycast relay considered a bad think (was Re: 6to4 connectivity test)
Next by thread: Re: 6to4 public anycast relay considered a bad think (was Re: 6to4 connectivity test)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread