[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71

To: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
Subject: Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:33:37 -0800
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <2CC5A353-C27E-43CF-A204-887EFD8FDC6C@ca.afilias.info>
References: <20080209085845.682F53A8176@core3.amsl.com> <BF2E98E2-FCA9-4C0A-882C-9256E59CB49E@cisco.com> <2CC5A353-C27E-43CF-A204-887EFD8FDC6C@ca.afilias.info>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:14 AM, Joe Abley wrote:

So I'm confused :-)

The obvious question has been placed to agenda@. I asked for, andwould prefer, 2.5 hours for the transition session - at 15 minutesper topic, it's pretty full. Stay tuned.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFHsKMRbjEdbHIsm0MRAgPFAJ9x6VUrX4Q4Kr1LQlnH0jtYR83FfwCcDYRZ
sLzY7OX/Q/KJnmgX04p6J9Q=
=DRwN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Initial agenda for IETF 71
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
  - From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>

Prev by Date: Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
Next by Date: Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
Previous by thread: Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
Next by thread: Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread