[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
Hi Fred,
I have a draft which I would want to be presented. It is the 6PE-Alt
draft which was recently discussed on this list.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-manral-idr-mpls-explicit-null-00.txt
One of my colleague Samita will be there in the IETF and she will be
able to present it. Is there a way I can get a slot for the same.
Thanks,
Vishwas
On Feb 11, 2008 10:04 AM, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> FYI. I asked for two sessions, one of 2.5 and one of 2 hours, and got
> two 2-hour sessions.
>
> > V6OPS Session 1 (2.5 hours)
> > Tuesday, Afternoon Session I 1300-1500
> > Room Name: Breakout Room
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > V6OPS Session 2 (2 hours)
> > Wednesday, Morning Session I 0900-1130
> > Room Name: Breakout Room
> > ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> The agenda items include the following. Note that I include a couple
> of drafts for which I have been promised updates (this week for -00,
> by next week otherwise). I would recommend reading these in advance,
> so that the discussion is fruitful.
>
> Tuesday: transition session
> Key objective: nail down transition expectations/requirements
> draft-jcurran-v6transitionplan
> draft-bagnulo-v6ops-6man-nat64-pb-statement
> draft-stenberg-v6ops-pd-route-maintenance
>
> draft-durand-v6ops-natv4v6v4
> draft-despres-v6ops-6rd-ipv6-rapid-deployment
> Iljitsch and Brian's merged proposal
> draft-miyata-v6ops-snatpt
> draft-miyata-v6ops-trans-approach
>
> Wednesday: general session
> Brian Dickson's suggestions
> draft-dickson-v6ops-aggregation
> draft-dickson-v6ops-assignment
>
> The RA discussion
> draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra if Tim updates it
> draft-vandevelde-v6ops-ra-guard
>
> CPE question
> Gunter's not-yet-submitted CPE-default-route-detection
> draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security
>
>
> - -----------------------------------------------------
> I did not include the two Teredo updates:
> draft-ietf-v6ops-teredo-security-concerns
> draft-krishnan-v6ops-teredo-update
>
> Since we are discussing these in v6ops, I am waiting for an update to
> the security-concerns document, and then will ask for last call
> comments on both. The "Teredo Update" may be sponsored by Mark
> Townsley, who sponsored Teredo.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iD8DBQFHsI4TbjEdbHIsm0MRAg+uAKCoXkdaqE5zCFApX9QowDLLidiVwQCg3PiR
> dwuHvAyePEzRKrCUpy8zRvA=
> =rD1x
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>