[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rogue RA problem statement

To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: rogue RA problem statement
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:21:27 -0800
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20080212145120.GL30232@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <20080209085845.682F53A8176@core3.amsl.com> <BF2E98E2-FCA9-4C0A-882C-9256E59CB49E@cisco.com> <20080212145120.GL30232@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>


On Feb 12, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Tim Chown wrote:

Anyway, perhaps the list could guide on updates to the problemstatement,
and what it says (loosely) about solution spaces.


wfm. thanks.

References:
- Initial agenda for IETF 71
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Re: rogue RA problem statement
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: rogue RA problem statement
Next by Date: RE: rogue RA problem statement
Previous by thread: RE: rogue RA problem statement
Next by thread: Re: Initial agenda for IETF 71
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread