[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Home network topology
- To: Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>
- Subject: Re: Home network topology
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:11:24 +1300
- Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=maG4wDUwQcZH+bV8rVD+poHwViAMTCXdyjYheg1xZ2eoVhLh+Gbg7RtNEBItd+Bv3k5PVECG8Op7m+tUlw/P3iOx3MVVuQ+yuO7VSMefzEcjgJYjLMShgG//DS7RnU6JqM3eG2AVlcouvVGfCZsBJgD/cV34hXynBfLS2VtuuDU=
- In-reply-to: <200803112148.17418.rdenis@simphalempin.com>
- Organization: University of Auckland
- References: <200803112148.17418.rdenis@simphalempin.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
On 2008-03-12 08:48, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
...
> For instance, 6to4rd is now proposing that only a /64 be assigned to a given
> customer. If we expect the home to be fully bridged, that's fine. Otherwise,
> there's going to be an interesting problem.
Why do you think we originally recommended /48 for all SOHO customers,
with some recent pressure to accept /56 as well? Clearly prefix delegation
has to be automated, though.
Bridging is bound to fail, if we see non-802 networks in the home.
Brian