On 2008-03-27 07:38, marcelo bagnulo wrote:
Hi,
during the v6ops meeting in Philadelphia, Michael brought up the issue
about multihoming support for NAT64 boxes. As we know, current NAT boxes
interact poorly with multihioming configurations. the question i guess
whether we should impose some requirements of multihoming support for
new NAT64 boxes.
I don't see how we can, since there is no single, agreed technique
for IPv6 multihoming, and I don't see why we would impose any constraint
to do better than regular v4 NAT on the v4 side.
It might be worth asking solutions to describe how they
interact with various multihoming techniques.