[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatic selection of transition mechanism?
- To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Automatic selection of transition mechanism?
- From: "Miguel A. Diaz" <miguelangel.diaz@consulintel.es>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:16:22 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=jKeWAgSMs9uPIN4996Gmm3syhdUcgjJDLvNmyWOxauaknWJQOULVuoEviKOoblUbGMHipcCSpoq8CpGHszl+dX4dEiuliPisk8ACx7XFXeuHCvb5Gm/FZacF8WcUxwLE2WWct73eC52oS2b2ozex5QwigQ0hiZxAwMzuLr4LK3U=;
- Reply-to: miguelangel.diaz@consulintel.es
On 26/03/2008, at 1:41 AM, <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>
<teemu.savolainen@nokia.com > wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we now have a set of mechanisms to transport IPv6 over IPv4
> standardized, and as it seems we will probably end up having a set
of
> mechanisms to access IPv4 destinations over IPv6-only access
(MNAT-PT,
> SNAT, NATv4v6v4.), has there been discussion already how a host that
> implements multiple transition technologies should efficiently and
> automatically discover which mechanisms to use in access networks it
> happens to attach (and move between)?
>
> Is the current state of the art just: trial & error, provisioning by
> non-IETF means, or as defined by other SDOs for their systems?
>
There is some work in the IETF done time ago regarding this topic. It
can be found at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-v6ops-auto-trans-02 It
explains how an auto-transition mechanism should work.
Regards
Miguel
**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.