Re: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO value 3

["Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>]

Hi Bob/ Jukka,

We at IPInfusion support RSVP for IPv6. Our implementation will
however not be affected by the fix mentioned below.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com> wrote:
> FYI
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: "Jukka MJ Manner" <jmanner@cs.Helsinki.FI>
>> Date: May 14, 2008 3:51:08 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: Transport Area WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org
>> >
>> Subject: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO
>> value 3
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are in the middle of fixing the IP Router Alert Option registry and
>> allocations, and one issue affects the current RSVP implementations.
>>
>> There are two values that indicate end-to-end RSVP:
>> "1" Datagram contains RSVP message    [RFC2711]
>> "3" RSVP Aggregation Level 0          [RFC3175]
>>
>> We are currently proposing that value "3" should be removed from
>> use, and
>> reserved (not to be allocated to any protocol). Thus, value "1"
>> should be
>> used to indicate end-to-end RSVP.
>>
>> The question is: who have RSVP implementations for IPv6, and would
>> this
>> change break something?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jukka
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>