[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (Microsoft Windows DHCP Team Blog) : Use of extended length prefixes

To: "Dunn, Jeffrey H." <jdunn@mitre.org>
Subject: Re: (Microsoft Windows DHCP Team Blog) : Use of extended length prefixes
From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:01:55 +0100
Cc: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <0AC4B700F00DBB4C94F95727E09914140116FDC4@IMCSRV7.MITRE.ORG>
References: <0AC4B700F00DBB4C94F95727E09914140116FDC4@IMCSRV7.MITRE.ORG>


On 6 Jun 2008, at 12:42, Dunn, Jeffrey H. wrote:

Many thanks to Ralph Droms for verifying that Cisco does support
extended prefixes.


	YMMV.  Not all Cisco kit supports extended prefixes equally.


	Best regards,

	Niall O'Reilly
	University College Dublin IT Services

	PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
	Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- FW: (Microsoft Windows DHCP Team Blog) : Use of extended length prefixes
  - From: "Dunn, Jeffrey H." <jdunn@mitre.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Use of extended prefix lengths
Next by Date: Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00.txt
Previous by thread: FW: (Microsoft Windows DHCP Team Blog) : Use of extended length prefixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread