[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario

To: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:38:22 +0200
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <C47C8BBB.126CA%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
References: <C47C8BBB.126CA%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)

Alain Durand  - Le 6/17/08 3:29 AM :

Brian,

Please note that this work (464pb statement & solution) is taken to
softwires.

is this to imply that the following drafts should from now on bediscussed in Softwires?

- draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00.txt
- draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64-00.txt
Any pointer to clarify where we stand would be useful.

Regards.

Rémi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
  - From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>

References:
- Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
  - From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
Next by Date: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
Previous by thread: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
Next by thread: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread