Alain Durand - Le 6/17/08 9:42 AM :
On 6/17/08 3:38 AM, "Rémi Després" <remi.despres@free.fr> wrote:
Alain Durand - Le 6/17/08 3:29 AM :Please note that this work (464pb statement & solution) is taken to softwires.is this to imply that the following drafts should from now on be discussed in Softwires? - draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00.txt - draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64-00.txt
No. I'm only talking about Nat464.
Thanks. Still ambiguous IMU on the "pb statement" part of 464, but OK.BTW is there a place where what is meant by NAT464 or "464 NAT" is defined in more details than in http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XXI/PDF/tuesday/464-ARIN_Durand.pdf ?
Rémi