[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario



Alain Durand  - Le 6/17/08 9:42 AM :
On 6/17/08 3:38 AM, "Rémi Després" <remi.despres@free.fr> wrote:

Alain Durand  - Le 6/17/08 3:29 AM :
Please note that this work (464pb statement & solution) is taken to
softwires.
is this to imply that the following drafts should from now on be
discussed in Softwires?
- draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00.txt
- draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64-00.txt

No. I'm only talking about Nat464.

Thanks.
Still ambiguous IMU on the "pb statement" part of 464, but OK.


BTW is there a place where what is meant by NAT464 or "464 NAT" is defined in more details than in http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XXI/PDF/tuesday/464-ARIN_Durand.pdf ?


Rémi