[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new draft on IPv6 CPE router available for review
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Shin Miyakawa wrote:
Especially, Mikael, how do you fix it ? This is still you have not answer yet.
I don't write RFCs. I don't really read them a lot either, just when I
absolutely need to. On the other hand, I know a lot about router
architecture and network operational issues and I know what I think would
be the best operational situation to have for IPv6 in 10 years, and that's
why I'm advocating the solution I'm advocating.
If you want to remove the merit of my proposal on the basis that I haven't
supplied RFC quality text to support it, well, then the IETF process is
broken because it doesn't listen to what the operational community has to
say. I am supplying operational input here, not RFC proposals.
Even if some ISP does not do assign global IPv6 address to the CPE,
that's up to that ISP.
If the draft doesn't put a strong emphesis on the POSSIBILITY of not
assigning a WAN IP address (and how this case should be handled), most
vendors will not implement it.
But their customer should be noticed that some machine which is compatible
IPv6 standard specification can not work correctly if that terminates upsteam link.
I have no problem with that. Services always has restrictions and
specifications.
Again, so I like the following original text of draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe-router-00.txt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.3. Acquire IPv6 address and other configuration parameters
The CPE Router must process RAs received on the WAN interface and as
instructed by the RA message, acquire global IPv6 address for WAN
interface using SLAAC or DHCPv6.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no problem with this, apart from that it doesn't say what should be
done if there is no WAN address received.
I am not saying your solution shouldn't be done, I'm saying I want the
possibility of both, and if these aren't included in material like this
draft, my proposal won't be realistically possible anytime soon.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se