RE: Comments on draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe-router-01.txt

["Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>]

Ole,

Thanks very much! I kind of figured it would be like this since my
example to Barbara said it would be wrong for a router to have two
disparate segments to be configured with same subnet.

Barbara and anyone else, you will have to get a global IPv6 address for
the WAN interface via SLAAC or DHCPv6 and then obtain the IA_PD via
DHCPv6 or stateless DHCPv6.

Hemant 

-----Original Message-----
From: ichiroumakino@gmail.com [mailto:ichiroumakino@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Ole Troan
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:06 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: Stark, Barbara; Antonio Querubin; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe-router-01.txt

Hemant,

> It does help us if you can point to text in RFC3633 that prohibits the
behavior that is being asked by some DSL folks.
>

section 12.1:

   Upon the receipt of a valid Reply message, for each IA_PD the
   requesting router assigns a subnet from each of the delegated
   prefixes to each of the links to which the associated interfaces are
   attached, with the following exception: the requesting router MUST
   NOT assign any delegated prefixes or subnets from the delegated
   prefix(es) to the link through which it received the DHCP message
   from the delegating router.

/ot