RE: Comments on draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe-router-01.txt

["Stark, Barbara" <bs7652@att.com>]

What is the reason for this prohibition? 
Barbara 

-----Original Message-----
From: ichiroumakino@gmail.com [mailto:ichiroumakino@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Ole Troan
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:06 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: Stark, Barbara; Antonio Querubin; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe-router-01.txt

Hemant,

> It does help us if you can point to text in RFC3633 that prohibits the
behavior that is being asked by some DSL folks.
>

section 12.1:

   Upon the receipt of a valid Reply message, for each IA_PD the
   requesting router assigns a subnet from each of the delegated
   prefixes to each of the links to which the associated interfaces are
   attached, with the following exception: the requesting router MUST
   NOT assign any delegated prefixes or subnets from the delegated
   prefix(es) to the link through which it received the DHCP message
   from the delegating router.

/ot

*****

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. GA623