[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comments on draft-thaler-v6ops-teredo-extensions-01
Hello,
Generally, the document should probably use the Teredo IANA prefix rather than
the former 6bone Microsoft prefix, no? I can also understand why the sample
IPv4 prefix is not used (need several addresses in preferrably separate
submets), but I wonder if this is acceptable.
Section 3 could mention that the connectivity matrix is symmetric, or even not
draw one half to make it obvious. There seems to be some XML typo here:
Yes = Supported by <xref target="RFC4380"/>.
Section 3.2 is spelt UPnP-specifically. I may well be missing something, but
it would seem to work with any middlebox mapping protocol, including SOCKSv5,
NAT-PMP, or even TURN (though I am not convinced that Teredo over TURN makes
much practical sense).
Regards
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/