[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)

To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)
From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:38:33 -0400
In-reply-to: <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D04E4201B@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com>
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.11.0.080522

On 7/22/08 6:33 PM, "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> wrote:

> I don't believe apps have to know topology if apps receive a GUA and a ULA.
> The app has to just ignore the ULA.

Exactly my point. Apps need to be made aware of the difference between ULA &
GUA, which is what the ULA proponents have been saying all along will not be
necessary.

  - Alain.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)
  - From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>

References:
- RE: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)
  - From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)
Next by Date: Re: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)
Previous by thread: RE: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)
Next by thread: Re: Permanent ULA support in home networking (Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread